Does the early bird outperform the worm?

Soccer Football – Women’s Super League – Manchester United v Everton  – Manchester United’s Kirsty Hanson in action with Everton’s Gabrielle George Action Images via Reuters/Lee Smith

An acute hamstring injury is the most common muscle injury involving high-speed running in sports. The financial, physical, and psychological burden on athletes and teams is significant. Furthermore, the reinjury rate is high. Therefore, effective hamstring injury rehabilitation is essential to reduce the risks and optimize individual and team performance.

Researchers at the Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark demonstrated that progressive targeted eccentric hamstring exercises and progressive running drills result in a faster return to sport (RTS) and a lower reinjury rate. However, when and how to implement the lengthening exercises remains a clinical challenge. Nevertheless, the researchers demonstrated that starting as early as five days post-injury improves RTS time and lowers the reinjury rate than conventional rehabilitation⁽¹⁾.

Recently, researchers at Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital in Doha, Qatar, designed a trial to compare the efficacy of early versus the delayed introduction of lengthening exercises on RTS time in male athletes with acute hamstring injuries. The researchers recruited and randomized 90 male athletes between 18-50 years into two groups. Researchers included athletes with a clinical diagnosis of an acute hamstring muscle strain injury, MRI-confirmed isolated hamstring lesion performed ≤5 days from injury, and the ability to attend three or more physiotherapy sessions per week at the study center⁽²⁾.

Start criteria-based rehabilitation early.

Both groups underwent a similar criteria-based rehabilitation program (see table 1)⁽²⁾. The difference between the treatment groups was the time point at which the physiotherapists introduced lengthening exercises. In the early lengthening group, the physiotherapists introduced the lengthening exercises on day one of rehabilitation. In the delayed group, the lengthening exercises were introduced at stage three (see table 1).

Table 1: The treatment protocol stages between the early and delayed groups⁽²⁾.

The physiotherapist uses clinical reasoning to progress athletes through the stages. The athletes progressed the exercise range of motion until they started to experience pain or discomfort.

Outcomes

1. Return to sports time

The study results showed a median RTS time of 23 days (interquartile range 16-35 days) for the early lengthening group and 33 days (interquartile range 23-40 days) for the delayed lengthening group. The current evidence pool demonstrates that RTS time varies significantly due to different definitions of RTS, interventions, and populations. For example, track athletes have different biomechanical and performance demands than field sports athletes. The researchers observed a potentially clinically relevant difference in favor of the early lengthening group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, practitioners need to interpret the data within their specific contexts. Notably, there are no apparent disadvantages to starting early lengthening in the acute stages post-injury.

2. Reinjury rates

The reinjury rates within two months were 8.6%. However, the reinjury rates dropped to 4.8% between the second and sixth months and 4.8% from six to twelve months. These results indicate that the highest risk of reinjury is within two months of RTS, and practitioners and athletes need to remain vigilant during the early periods.

Conclusion

The authors concluded that introducing lengthening exercises in the early stages of hamstring injury rehabilitation does not improve RTS time or enhance the risk of reinjury; however, the early introduction of lengthening exercises is safe and effective.

Reference list

1. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:528–37.
2. Br J Sports Med 2022;0:1–9.