BRINGING SCIENCE TO TREATMENT
Adam Smith explores the anatomy of intramuscular hamstring tendons, outlines an injury classification system and using a case study, provides treatment and rehab options following surgical repair.
December 17, 2017 Manchester United’s Antonio Valencia after sustaining an injury to his hamstring
Hamstring injuries are the most common muscular injury in athletes with most injuries occurring at the musculotendinous junction(1-3). There is some evidence that injuries that involve the intramuscular tendon require a longer rehabilitation period and have higher recurrence rates(2). Imaging is useful to determine the location and severity of injury, and with improved MRI resolution, the astute clinician can also determine whether a muscle injury involves the intramuscular tendon.
Traditionally all hamstring injuries – with the exception of large proximal tendon ruptures/avulsions – have been treated with conservative management. However surgical repair of injuries that involve the intramuscular tendon is now possible, and leading to some good results(3).
The hamstring muscle group is comprised of three separate muscles: the biceps femoris (short and long head), semimembranosus and the semitendinosus (see figure 1). The proximal tendon of the semimembranosus originates from the lateral facet of the ischial tuberosity; the semitendinosus and the biceps femoris meanwhile share the common tendon origin on the medial facet of the ischial tuberosity(3).
If both the proximal and distal portions of the bicep femoris are considered, the muscle tendon junction of the bicep femoris extends the full length of its muscle belly(2). The proximal tendon comprises approximately 60% of the length of the muscle(2). The free part of the proximal tendon (which has no inserting muscle fascicles) extends approximately 6.5 cm distally, with its long musculotendinous junction spanning 45% of the muscle length, to terminate deep within the muscle belly(2). The distal tendon and muscle-tendon junction extends up to 66% of the muscle length(2). Similarly, the semimembranosus has a proximal tendon and distal tendon that extends approximately 78% and 52% respectively into the muscle. The proximal tendon of the semitendinousus is the shortest of all the hamstring muscles, and extends about 30% of the length of the muscle.
Clinically, some hamstring injuries resolve quickly whilst others take longer to recover (or may even fail conservative treatment and reoccur). One factor that has been thought to explain this is involvement of the intramuscular tendon(2). On MRI, the tendon may be seen to maintain its structural integrity, or it may lose its integrity and take on a irregular, wavy contour, or it may be frankly disrupted.
The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification System (BAMICS) was developed to help clinicians determine not only the severity of a soft tissue injury, but also the type of tissue involved. This system is based on MRI findings and categorises the injury numerically by severity (1=small, 2=moderate, 3=extensive, 4=complete tear) and alphabetically by site (a=myofascial, b= myotendinous, c=intratendinous).
Researchers studying a series of hamstring injuries in AFL players showed that those with bicep femoris injuries without tendon disruption had a recovery time of 21 days, whereas those with tendon disruption treated non operatively recovered in 72 days. Those with tendon disruption requiring surgery recovered in 91 days(2).
In a study of track and field athletes, Pollock et al found similar results; when the injury extended into the tendon, athletes took longer to return to full activity (3c injuries took 84 days while 2b injuries took 21 days). They also has a higher rate of recurrence (2c injuries 63%; 3c injuries 57%; 2b injuries 6%)(2). Interestingly, there were no significant differences between injury grades 1 and 2 or classification a and b. This demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool with regard to hamstring injuries in the clinical setting as it identifies possible tendon involvement, which influences injury prognosis and management.
A 26-year old elite cricketer (wicket keeper) suffered a hamstring strain whilst playing a game of touch football during pre season training. The player had no history of hamstring or lumbar spine injury. The injury occurred when he was sprinting to catch an opposition player who had made a ‘break’, and while he was reaching forward to touch him.
The player felt sudden pain in his hamstring and fell to the ground. He was unable to walk so was assisted off the field. At the time, he described a feeling like a ‘balloon deflating’ in his hamstring. His pain was localised to the proximal one third of the hamstring, approximately 5-10cm from the origin.
A MRI scan was conducted the following day, showing a full thickness rupture of the biceps femoris tendon 78mm from its origin with 31mm retraction (see figure 2). Considering it was full thickness tear (grade 4 on BAMICS), a surgical opinion was advised. The player was reviewed with a surgeon three days post injury, and underwent surgery to repair the ruptured tendon the following day. There is no consensus on the best management of injuries that involve the intramuscular tendon(4). However, surgery was recommended as the return to play timeframes with conservative management and surgical management were similar, and the risk of recurrence was significantly lower with surgery.
Initially the aim was to return to playing elite domestic cricket at 12 weeks post surgery. Considering the specific injury and the demands of a game, return-to-play criteria were established, which outlined key physical parameters (clinical and functional measures) that needed to be met prior to returning to play (see table 1).
| Test | Description of test and goal | Result and date of previous best | Date achieved | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range of movement and clinical tests: | Knee extension ROM | Supine 90/90 | 70 deg L and R 20/6/18 | 72deg 22nd August |
| Hamstring bridge endurance test | Endurance (>18reps 90% of screening score) | 20 reps 20/6/18 | 20 reps 20th August | |
| Isometric hamstring in prone | Pain and strength >308N (90% previous score at 30deg) | L 301N, R343N 9/7/18 | 431 N 10th Sept | |
| Nordic test | More than 433 (90% of previous score) | L 472N, R 482N 8/6/18 | L 501, R466. 17th Aug | |
| Functional milestones: | Resume normal walking - ADL's | Gait pattern | 6th August | |
| Start jogging | No pain walking | 10th August | ||
| High-speed running - *most critical* | More than 25kph - GPS - minimum 5 sessions | 5th session completed 18th Sept | ||
| Chronic GPS loads | Three consecutive weeks achieving all velocity band loads equivalent to Shield match | 17th Sept - high loads last 3 weeks (wks 5-7) | ||
| Batting - throw downs | Throw downs | Commenced 17th August | ||
| Batting - nets (unrestricted) | If no issues during previous week | Achieved 30th August | ||
| Stationary catching/keeping | Above knee high catches to start - progress as able | Commenced 17th August | ||
| Unrestricted keeping- (centre wicket) | Complete 5 full sessions | Achieved 18th August | ||
| 2km TT | 7mins:30 or less | 7min 13/7/18 | 7:18 -17th Sept | |
| Counter movt Vertical Jump | More than 61cm (90% of previous score) | 67cm (20/7/18) | 62cm -17th Sept | |
| Run a quick single | Reach HSR with lunge for crease | >26kph | Achieved 11th Sept | |
| Mid thigh pull | More than 4.64 relative force (90% of previous score) | 5.15 relative force 2/7/18 | 4.8- 19th Sept |
The running criteria were based on GPS data obtained from the previous years data to ensure adequate capacity was achieved. Table 2 shows GPS data from a competition week for a one day tournament in the previous year for this player (including 2 games and training). Consistent high speed running is protective against hamstring injuries so it was deemed as a critical component to help mitigate the risk of re-injury when he returned to playing.
| Total Distance | Vel Band 1 (0-11.02km/hr) | Vel Band 2 (11.02km-14km/hr) | Vel Band 3 (14-20.99 km/hr) | Vel Band 4 (20.99-25.99km/hr) | Vel Band 5 (26+km/hr) | Max Velocity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 250m | 33 489m | 4 515m | 3 391m | 671m | 184m | 30.7km/hr |
The post operative instructions initially were as follows:
The initial phase of rehabilitation progressed very well (table 3 outlines the progression in the early phases of rehabilitation).
| Week | Subjective | Clinical observations / tests | Specific hamstring exercises | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Able to walk without pain - still having difficulty putting pants on due to lack of hip function (feels wound, gets tight) otherwise ADLs going really well Hip F ROM (supine)- 80deg Hamstring length in supine 25 deg (at 80deg hip F) | Significant bruising. Hip F ROM (supine)- 80deg Hamstring length in supine 25 deg (at 80deg hip F) | Bridge- up on 2 legs hold on 1. Standing and prone hamstring curls | ADLs only |
| 2 | Going really well much better walking and putting pants on able to bike and do boxing today | Hip F ROM (supine) -90deg hamstring length in supine at 90deg hip F- 25deg. DL squat to 90deg no concerns. HHD strength in prone (30deg) to P1 L 299, R 105 able to do hamstring curl in prone 2kg. | BW squat, hamstring curl prone 2kg. Hip abd/add Theraband work in standing | Bike and boxing for fitness. Commenced graduated return to run from day 14. |
| 3 | Going well saw surgeon happy to progress as pain allows | No restrictions with ADL's HHD strength in prone0deg L 235, R 132 ,30deg L 325, R 140, 90deg L 206, R 114 | Progress running, commence batting and keeping drills |
Hamstring exercises were commenced as pain allowed and were broken into a couple of phases. In the later stages, the emphasis was on eccentric loading to help protect against re-injury. Examples of hamstring exercises used in each phase were:
Initial phase (0-2 weeks)
Phase two (2-4 weeks)
Phase three (weeks 4-8)
At four weeks post operation, the patient developedsome intermittent sharp stabbing pain in the gym when was doing a reverse lunge to step up. An ultrasound was arranged which showed some slight neural tethering around scar. The player was able to continue to training but modified his speed work when running. These symptoms then resolved with soft tissue treatment and neural mobilisation techniques by week six.
Hamstring strength was deemed to be an important criterion to determine the player’s readiness for return to play. To monitor strength progressions, hamstring strength testing was done through isometric testing (see table 4) and single leg bridge (based on the pre-season screening test). On pre-season testing for hamstring endurance two months prior to injury, the player was able to achieve 20reps for the single-leg bridge. At four weeks post operation, he was able to achieve the same result of 20 reps.
| Test | Pre-injury | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHD at 30deg prone | Best (June 2018) L) 418 R) 418 | L) 343 R) 149 | L) 330 R)202 | L) 319 R) 283 | L) 404 R) 431 | L) 369 R) 356 | L) 400 R) 413 |
Finally, from a specific hamstring strength and injury protection point of view, a Nordic hamstring test was performed seven weeks post surgery. The results were L) 501, R) 466N. This was slightly lower than his previous best a year beforehand (L) 472, R) 482) but showed good strength and symmetry.
As well as specific strengthening, running was an important component of his rehabilitation. Running was progressed as pain allowed, and by 5 weeks post op he was able to recommence HSR running (>26km/hr). By day 51, the player had completed his return-to-play criteria and returned to club cricket. He was able to bat for 25 overs. One week later, he was cleared to play a domestic 1-day game. Since then he has continued to play both 1-day cricket , 20/20 cricket and 4-day cricket without any recurrence of hamstring pain.
in Leg injuries, Musculoskeletal injuries, Prevent
Hamstring injuries frequently plague soccer players. Andrew Hamilton looks at potential screening tests to identify athletes at an increased risk of hamstring failure and determines their worth to those seeking to avoid this debilitating injury. Hamstring strain injuries (HSIs) are one of the most common soccer injuries(1). Research suggests that HSIs account for around one... MORE
in Diagnose & Treat, Shoulder injuries, Uncommon injuries
Athletes with persistent and undiagnosed shoulder pain may suffer from the rare but painful quadrilateral space syndrome. Chris Mallac unravels this complex diagnosis and offers practical treatment solutions. Quadrilateral Space Syndrome (QSS), first described in 1983, is a rare and unusual shoulder pathology primarily seen in male volleyballers, swimmers, and baseball pitchers(1,2). Athletes with QSS... MORE
in Anatomy, Diagnose & Treat, Hip injuries
In the second part of this two-part article, Andrew Hamilton looks at the best imaging modalities for hip avulsion injuries and explores the most up to date injury management guidelines. As discussed in part one of this article, the presentation and location of a hip avulsion injury can vary greatly. This is due to the... MORE
in Diagnose & Treat, Shoulder injuries, Uncommon injuries
In the first of a two-part series, Chris Mallac explains the functional anatomy of the pectoralis major and its tendon, the situations that place the tendon at risk for injury, and the signs and symptoms of a ruptured tendon. The first reported case of pectoralis major (PM) tendon rupture occured in Paris in 1822. Up... MORE
in Anatomy, Core injuries, Diagnose & Treat
Tracy Ward considers the biomechanical and physical aspects of rowing and their contribution to upper extremity injuries and explores injury prevention strategies, including targeted strength and conditioning. Rowing is a repetitive, weight-supported sport where the high training volumes are similar to cycling, kayaking, and swimming(1). Despite being non-contact and low-impact, rowers are still subject to... MORE
in Diagnose & Treat, Hip injuries
In the first of a two-part series, Andrew Hamilton looks at common hip avulsion injuries in athletes, the relationship between injury mechanism and location, and guidelines for avulsion injury diagnosis. An avulsion injury occurs when large or chronic forces transmitted through muscles, tendons, and connective tissue pull a fragment of bone away at the site... MORE
