Is RPE appropriate following ACLR?

Soccer Football – Women’s Super League – Reading v Arsenal – Madejski Stadium, Reading, Britain – January 17, 2021 Arsenal’s Jill Roord in action with Reading’s Kristine Leine who goes down after sustaining an injury Action Images via Reuters/Andrew Couldridge

Paper title: Should We Trust Perceived Effort for Loading Control and Resistance Exercise Prescription After
ACL Reconstruction?

Publication: Sports Health

Publication date: September, 2021

INTRODUCTION

Quadriceps weakness is a barrier to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rehabilitation. In addition, neural inhibition causes arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). The management of AMI includes strength and proprioception exercises. Rating of perceived effort (RPE) is a simple, easy, safe, and widely used method for monitoring loads and prescribing resistance exercise intensity during ACLR rehabilitation.

The function of the ACL is to provide knee mechanical stability and neurosensory joint motor control. The intact ACL has mechanoreceptors that provide information to the CNS related to joint movements. The neural adaptations after ACL rupture and reconstruction involve brain areas responsible for RPE; however, it is unclear whether these adaptations interfere with RPE. Therefore, this conceptual paper aims to describe the neural adaptations after ACL rupture and reconstruction and the possible implications on RPE for exercise intensity prescription.

RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION MODELS

There are three models to explain RPE neurophysiology:

1. The afferent feedback model suggests that RPE integrates sensory inputs from musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory systems to the somatosensory cortex.
2. The corollary discharge model suggests RPE is independent of peripheral sensory input. Instead, RPE is generated by motor cortex information to the peripheral muscles via corticospinal pathways, and the somatosensory cortex receives “copies” of these impulses.
3. The combined model suggests that both the afferent feedback and the corollary discharge are directly and indirectly related to RPE.

ADDITIONAL NEURAL CONTRIBUTORS TO RPE

The brain areas related to memory, previous experiences, emotions, motivation, pain, and awareness influence RPE. Pain is an emotional and affective experience that involves the somatosensory, cingulate, and prefrontal cortex. In addition, kinesiophobia represents the fear of movement associated with painful and emotional experiences. Patients who undergo ACLR can not inhibit areas of the brain associated with pain and fear when visualizing sport-specific tasks. Therefore, since pain and kinesophobia induce alterations in the same emotional-related brain areas responsible for generating RPE, it is reasonable to hypothesize that RPE could be affected.

CONCLUSION

Rating of perceived exertion is a simple and easy-to-use tool to monitor load and prescribe exercise intensity during ACLR rehabilitation. However, ACL injury could alter RPE. Therefore, clinicians should re-evaluate RPE reliability in this cohort. The authors suggest that until evidence supports the use of RPE in ACLR rehabilitation, clinicians should use objective measures to assess exercise intensity.