Rehab for RC Tears: Optimizing Recovery in Soccer Goalkeepers

Mechanisms of RC Injury

Acute injury in goalkeepers may result from traumatic events such as falls onto an outstretched arm or sudden forced external rotation or abduction of the shoulder⁽⁴⁾. Chronic overload, in contrast, arises from repetitive eccentric loading, accumulation of microtrauma, and periodic tensile and compressive stressors. Repetitive overload or high-load motion, combined with instability or subacromial impingement, leads to tendon degeneration or partial tears^(4-6).

Youth and professional goalkeepers demonstrate higher rates of shoulder injury than outfield players, with repetitive dives, parries, overhead reaches, and rapid deceleration imposing cumulative mechanical demands on the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and periscapular musculature^(1,3,6). Elite goalkeepers are at particular risk due to their high-volume and high-force training and match demands, underscoring the susceptibility of the shoulder complex to acute and chronic loads^(6,7). Furthermore, biomechanical analyses reveal that goalkeeper dives generate peak glenohumeral joint forces exceeding 1.5 times body weight, with eccentric rotator cuff demands peaking during the landing phase due to rapid arm deceleration and ground impact, which can exacerbate subacromial compression and supraspinatus tendon tensile failure⁽⁸⁾. Shoulder dislocations, a proxy for instability that contributes to rotator cuff strains, often occur via direct contact (42%) or falls (35%), highlighting the need for rehabilitation emphasizing eccentric control and proximal stability⁽⁹⁾.

Assessment and Early-Phase Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation begins with a thorough clinical assessment, including evaluation of pain irritability, active and passive range of motion, scapular positioning and control, glenohumeral stability, RC strength, and functional tasks that mimic goalkeeping actions. Validated tools such as the scapular dyskinesis test, closed-kinetic-chain upper-extremity stability test, and isokinetic dynamometry for external rotation strength provide objective baselines, helping quantify deficits in eccentric capacity, which is critical for dive landings^(5,10). Clinicians may refer the athlete for imaging when they suspect full-thickness tears, when the athlete presents with persistent dysfunction, or for pre-surgical planning.

Early-phase rehabilitation

Clinicians should prioritize pain management, tissue-healing timelines, and reactivation of shoulder and scapular stabilizers without provoking excessive loading. Scapular stabilization exercises reduce pain and improve function in RC pathology^(5,6). Optimal activation ratios (<1.00) for periscapular stabilizers relative to the upper trapezius minimize dominance and enhance mechanics (see table 1)⁽¹¹⁾. For goalkeepers, clinicians may include low-load drills like prone/side-lying external rotation and isometric external rotation to preserve tendon activation without strain. Add submaximal non-throwing drills for neuromuscular control. Prone/side-lying/supine open-chain exercises optimize protraction/retraction for scapular stability during healing.

Table 1: Optimal Scapular Stabilization Exercises(11)

Key: lower trapezius (LT)/middle trapezius (MT)/serratus anterior (SA)/upper trapezius (UT)

Progressive Rehabilitation

Once the athlete’s pain is controlled and they tolerate basic shoulder activation, rehabilitation should progress to dynamic strengthening, including RC  eccentric and concentric loading, periscapular muscle strengthening, and core/trunk stabilization. Kinetic-chain exercises are crucial for goalkeepers, whose performance relies on the coordinated movement of the spine, pelvis, lower limbs, and upper limbs (see figure 2)^(5,6). For instance, anti-rotation cable presses or single-leg deadlifts with overhead reaches can integrate lumbopelvic control, reducing compensatory glenohumeral stress during simulated parry motions⁽²⁾.

Eccentric exercises for the RC help the tendon adapt to deceleration stresses associated with diving, abrupt arm braking, and repeated shot saves. Neuromuscular conditioning should incorporate proprioceptive training and perturbation drills to re-establish joint position sense, reaction capability, and coordinated control under variable loads. Closed-chain and unstable-surface work may enhance sensorimotor control, which is critical for rapid, unpredictable goalkeeper tasks^(5,6). Progression criteria include achieving pain-free performance of three sets of 15 repetitions at 60–70% of maximal voluntary contraction before advancing loads.

Advanced GK-Specific Reconditioning

As the GK’s shoulder and kinetic-chain capacity improve, the final rehabilitation phase should simulate the demands of actual play. This includes high-velocity overhead movements, explosive dives, reactive saves, rapid deceleration, catch or parry mechanics, and unpredictable directional changes^(3,6,7). Biomechanically, these drills should target peak eccentric rotator cuff loads (e.g., 120–150% body weight during landing) while monitoring scapulohumeral rhythm to prevent impingement⁽⁸⁾.

Advanced drills might include medicine-ball throws and slams; reactive catching/punching drills with variable ball speeds; plyometric push-ups on unstable surfaces; overhead reach with rapid deceleration using resistance bands; controlled diving onto soft surfaces, with emphasis on tucked-elbow positioning; and progressive reintroduction of full-diving drills at gradually increasing intensity. Objective monitoring should guide progression through functional tests, including closed-kinetic-chain upper-extremity stability, single-arm medicine-ball overhead throw, reach-and-catch drills, maximal external rotation strength, and symmetry measures^(5-7). Goalkeeper-specific metrics, such as dive reaction time (<0.5 seconds) and save success rate in simulated scenarios, can further tailor reconditioning⁽²⁾.

“Rehabilitation should adopt a structured, biomechanics-informed approach…”

Return to Play Considerations

Return to play (RTP) after an RC tear in a GK should rely on functional readiness, objective performance metrics, and psychological confidence, rather than a strict timeline (see table 2). Retrospective analyses indicate that most professional goalkeepers can return to full competition after shoulder surgery, though persistent symptoms or reinjury may occur⁽⁷⁾. In overhead athletes undergoing arthroscopic RC repair, return to play rates average 75%, with 62% resuming pre-injury levels within six months, emphasizing the role of eccentric strength restoration⁽¹²⁾.

Return to play benchmarks include:

•    ≥90–95% Upper-limb strength symmetry index in external/internal rotation,
•    Completion of sport-specific drills without pain or altered mechanics,
•    Adequate scapular control and kinetic-chain coordination,
•    Psychological readiness to perform dives, parries, and overhead saves.

Clinicians must implement a graded, staged return, beginning with non-contact technical drills, progressing to full-intensity training, and culminating in competitive matches, with ongoing monitoring by clinicians and coaching staff. Consensus guidelines recommend clearance only when athletes achieve pre-injury throwing velocity and show no compensatory patterns on video analysis⁽¹⁰⁾.

Table 2: Summary of return to play benchmarks(2,10-12)

Conclusion

Rotator cuff tears in soccer GKs pose unique challenges due to the high mechanical demands of dives, saves, and landings. Verified epidemiological and case-report data support a higher incidence of shoulder injury in GKs compared to field players. Rehabilitation should adopt a structured, biomechanics-informed approach, progressing from early scapular control and isometric activation to dynamic strengthening, neuromuscular conditioning, and sport-specific reconditioning. Objective assessment, progressive loading, and kinetic-chain integration are critical to safe RTP and long-term shoulder health. The limitations of current literature highlight the need for further goalkeeper-specific research, including prospective trials on RTP outcomes and biomechanical interventions.

References

1. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46(3):304–311.
2. Arch Med Deporte. 2024;41(5):281-290. 
3. Open Access J Sports Med. 2016;7:75–80.
4. Sports Med. 1997;24(3):205–220.
5. J Athl Train. 2000;35(3):300–315. 
6. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014;22(2):101–109.
7. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(12):3943-3950. 
8. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(10):1135-1142. 
9. J Exp Orthop. 2024;11(1):e70121. 
10. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(1):4–20. 
11. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(3):321-336. 
12. J Orthop Traumatol. 2023;24(1):6.